Time Crunch: Time to Reevaluate How We Use Time

It’s Back to School, and I, like every other parent, is crunched for time and bowing under the weight of pursuing personal success and supporting success for her children.  Much of it all comes down to Time.

Time for school.  Time for homework.  Time to relax.  Time to get them to bed in time for enough rest.  Time for self-fulfillment, time for self-indulgence (mine are only 6 and 3 years old, after all!).  Time for physical activity.  Time for musical and artistic development or enrichment.  Time for play.  Time for cleaning up and putting away.  Time for reading.  Time for imagination.  Time to talk and question and answer.

That’s a lot of Time for a working professional mother like me who also needs a lot of Time for herself.  Time for work, time for overtime, time for the commute, time for my personal projects, time with my husband, time for sports, time for hobbies, my siblings, my friends?  Time… so much Time that the more I write the word, the less it seems articulate, or even real.

But the repercussions of Time are very real.  According to current social mores, if your child doesn’t start lessons in a particular instrument or sport at a young enough age, the child will probably carry a lag compared to others (unless the child has unusual talent in the domain).  If your child lacks the maturity for certain math problems, the poor grades of the time will negatively impact the child’s record and/or confidence and may be set back from hen as the child will maybe be excluded from the higher math class from then on.  If your child doesn’t excel at standardized tests, there’s a chance that the child won’t be able to stay in that school that has to keep its pass rate high enough to retain funding.  It’s even worse for working parents and, above all, working women who, with or without children, suspected to take away too much Time from her work to care for babies, children, or elders.

Yet, if our society shifted from this standardized, timed success towards a more spherical time in which maturity and naturalness enabled each of us to grow at our own pace and in our own way, we would all be greatly enriched by gifts of maturity and wisdom that life experience carries.  

In the past, I have made the case for incorporating our understanding of quantum physics into our lives, setting up a system that obeys natural maturational processes and qualitative growth instead of always reducing everything to the ticking of measurement and quantification.  In the past, I have argued that we refuse to minimize our lives to a Tayloristic, linear logic of “then and than” and move onto a more quantum, spherical approach to learning and achievement with greater emphasis on accomplishment and growth instead of squelched memorization and graded success.

When we allow ourselves to grow with experience, with scientific method of hypothesis and testing, when we leave time for play and imagination, our children are likely to learn more quickly and fully than when they plug away at hours of homework every night after school.  When we take time to debate and constructively argue, we stand to gain much more knowledge and wisdom than memorizing dates and trivia.  This might not meet the quantified and quantifiable expectations of “then and than” linear time, nor does anyone probably have any Time for it… but it is more likely to build better thinkers.  Children who have sturdier building blocks for learning and retaining their acquired knowledge both at school and during their free time.  Citizens who have  better grasp on how things (objects, systems, relationships) work and therefore a better hold on their own lives and the weight of their vote. 

As a working mother want for Time and worried about her children being able to survive in our “then and than” linear timing and Performance Society, I feel the drag toward ticking away steadily without question, marching to the beat of the drummer as best we can with no slack to ever consider a different tune, a more harmonious rhythm that would enable our societies to start to dream again a dream of progress, improvement, fullness, and sustainable growth.

 And if we mothers don’t have time to help imagine and build a better society, who will?

 It’s time for us to be freed up from the race-time imperative and give time back where we need it most:  debate, quality progress, sustainable growth, critical knowledge.

Talk to you next week for another bite from the apple,

Eve

Glass Ceiling? The 21st Century will be about fighting the Glass Cage

This year, Barnard College’s graduating class was addressed by Barack Obama at its commencement ceremony.  Obama made a great speech in the name of activism and collective implication, rallying the women before him to, “fight for a place at the table; to fight for a place at the head of the table.”

He’s right on!  And clearly, if he’s making a case for it, it’s because we aren’t there yet; there’s still much work to be done.

Well, I’d like to high-five him and bid even higher:  our fight must include working mothers at the table.

Currently, society is evolving towards a divide between women who devote their lives to their work vs. women who have children – whether or not they also work outside the home.  According to Rana Foroohar in Time magazine (May 21, 2012 edition), “in many wealthy, urban areas of the US and Europe, young, well-educated and (crucially) childless women now out-earn their male peers… whereas some married couples are deciding to live on one salary when the economic trade-off of lower-paying jobs, child-care costs, taxes and commuting doesn’t add up… [leaving] two extremes: those with demanding, well-paid jobs who can afford help to manage their lives, homes, and children – and those who provide that help.”

What we’re up against is a glass ceiling that’s curving into a glass cage for working mothers.

It’s to such an extent that many American women are forced into making the “choice” to stay home with their children.  But costly day-care and taxes are not the only culprits, for here in France, we have similar discrimination despite high-quality state-subsidized day care, some elderly care, and universal healthcare.  It all comes down to the fact that corporations expect absolute availability and that, as a woman, particularly suspect of disloyalty (she might have a baby or use sick days to take care of an aging parent), must do everything a man does but “backwards and in heels,” to quote Ginger Rogers referring to Fred Astair.  Sheryl Sandberg made it to the “table” but only after sleepless nights by Mark Zuckerberg’s side.  Total devotion.   Anything less, and you’re suspect of not being committed enough. 

Fine for Rogers and Sandberg, but this is unsustainable, it leaves out a lot of talent, and it leaves out the great skills acquired as a parent which could be transferred into an executive’s quality of work. 

I graduated from Barnard Columbia in 1998.  My commencement address was far more sobering.  Joyce Purnick gave us the low-down:  women, she said, you can’t Have It All!  I balked at the time… but I am still struggling to prove her wrong.   And, around me, I can see many, many women facing the same battle of “only” working 9 or 10 hours a day in order to see their children at night… only to find themselves marginalized at work, their career paths slowed because their priorities are resented. 

That’s why I’m pleading that the “glass cage” be one of the major battles of the 21^st century.   Without it, women will be forced into reductionist views either expecting women to stay home with their children or, to be a good professional, have no children at all.  Honestly, attachment parenting that’s been getting so much press is not the point, nor are questions over perfect parenting (or, rather, perfect mothering);

these are decoys stealing attention away from the larger issue of incorporating family into our career-filled lives. 

Obama’s strategy of getting more women “at the table” should help catalyze collective progress… but only if the debate stops being strictly about gender.  The women at the table must include working mothers, in addition to the childless and to the women who have decided to have their children raised by someone else (I mention them because often I have heard the most pressure and/or discrimination against young mothers trying to do both comes from older women who had to sacrifice motherhood to stay in the game:  “if I had to do it, so should you”).

The guiding principle of our aim should center on quality of life for all our citizens – children needing care, aging parents needing care… and adults needing breathing room to improve their lives (as well as the quality of the work they supply).   Our society is an ecosystem that thrives on oxygen and circulation, as does a body.  As long as we nourish only a few individuals born within the elite, there can be no lasting progress, either individual or collective.  It is time to ignite a system which includes every age and every class, so that we may all move forward, together.

Please share your thoughts in the comment below.

In the meantime, talk to you next week, for another bite from the apple,

Eve

Entering a 21st Century Cult of Living: Building Youth with Age

21^st Century Call:  Move Beyond our Cult of Youth to a Cult of Living

I posited in my last entry that many of our strategies for living the Cult of Youth may actually be counter-productive due to the fact that our efforts to appear younger somewhat prevent us from being and living more youthfully.  After all, our goals should be about improving our quality of life; not simply about creating optical illusions for others!   

Here I would like to prolong that reflection by considering our current fears and goals in order to reframe them into a Cult of Living.

It’s time to reconstruct our fears of aging and our goals of youth.

There is societal significance in the obsession of effacing age.  Ostensibly, it is an attempt to defy mortality, in response to our great fear of death. 

But could it, in reality, represent a fear of being?

Indeed, wrinkles are often indicators of our past and the experiences which have built our personal character and have led us to make certain choices, good and bad.  They represent our gained perspective, right or wrong.  They are a visible mark of our growth and evolution, easy or belabored.  They are part of who we are.

And here we are trying to efface them.  Erase them.  Disown them.  Avoid ever acquiring them.  As if refusing our very being would allow us to relive our nostalgic idea of the easiness of youth, or start again with a clean slate; keep our options open.  Perhaps we are flirting with perpetual adolescence in order to flee the alleged constraints of being an adult:  the end of possibilities, the end of spontaneity, and the compromise of our dreams (as depicted by “emerging adults” (18-29 year olds in the Western world) recorded by socio-psychologist Jeffrey Jensen Arnett’s extensive research).

But, could it be that out of fear of this type of stagnation, we are avoiding filling in our actual lives as completely as we could or should?  That we don’t want to accept who we are, opting instead to play act and perform, as would an adolescent, simply in the name of a figurative possibility of re-creating our lives?  Could this be the key to why we are rejecting any visible manifestations of “growing up”? And, by consequence, any overly defining characteristics?

These reflexes reveal erroneous representations of youth and of adulthood.   

Youth and adolescence are not so much about freedom but about conformity, as they try on different masks to figure out who they are and who they want to be.  Far from freestyle living and spontaneity, adolescents are beholden to others’ approval and an exacerbated need for belonging and approbation.   Even their dreams are normative, “everyone will find a lifelong partner, and a great job, and live happily ever after”. 

In today’s performance society, the need to make the “right” choice is acute; it’s not surprising we all shy away from closing doors.  But the representation of adulthood and age as only rigid, static, conservative, and anti-dynamic is inaccurate and limiting.  In reality, adulthood represents the life-stage during which we acquire at last the wisdom and maturity required for actually free and deliberate living, positive control, etc.  For, adulthood can (and should) be a very dynamic stage in which the individual has at last accepted responsibility for one’s self, making one’s own decisions, and with financial independence.   It is the stage during which the individual has shed the urgent need for approval and during which, thanks to having closed certain doors, we can open new ones more befitting to whom we have become and want to actually be. 

On the other hand, if we don’t (or society doesn’t) allow us the freedom to make choices and move on, we will continue to prevent ourselves from building a strong sense of who we are.  In this case, we quickly find ourselves up against the “void” of existence which is at the root of our Cult of Youth.   As has said Susan Ertz in her novel Anger in the Sky, “millions long for immortality who don’t know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.”  As a society, we seem to have opted for projections and appearances instead of actually building ourselves up to Be. 

Again, much of the confusion stems from our performance society in which there can only be one winner and in which we are each pitted against each other.  Part of the trouble is that as a person ages, that person, man or woman, as a social animal, needs to feel assured that he/she will not be ostracized, cut off from the community (especially as the person reaches an age that is less self-sufficient, depending more on society and social network for survival).  For that, he/she needs to feel desired, loved, included.

The trouble is, we’re all competing for the same places.  Cougars and Lolitas are aiming to charm the same men (who, clearly, still need to be liberated and realize that their manliness is not exclusively proven by their ability to seduce young women – they should move on to mature women!!!).  Just as are Snow White and the Evil Queen.  But attempting to retrieve the person we were at 20 is a chronic of a failure foretold… and can only lead to despair.  The Evil Queen is proof!  And putting all our worth in our looks is a second error that I’ll develop in next week’s blog.

The fact of the matter is that we owe it to ourselves, as individuals and as a species, to explore the full potential of each age and life-stage and, in this way, embrace the many dimensions of Being.

This is why, to make for a more durable societal scheme in the 21^st century, we need to clarify (and make, if so needed) roles for each, enabling older men and women to have a respectable and respected place in society.  In addition to the beauty of youth, maturity can and should have an appeal.   We must reshape our societal myth of beauty, charm, attraction, etc., to make it fuller and more extensive than simply an anti-age appearance.  It’s the only way to avoid having “being” reduced to being “young” (i.e. in one’s early 20s – which is also a problem for young girls and young teens). 

What is now needed is to foster conduits so that mature and aging adults’ contributions are recognized and valued… in order to induce a synergetic cycle that benefits each age and its valuable role.

We can begin by recalibrating our aims.  Currently, the way we are pursuing the Cult of Youth seems to be pushing us into incorporating mainly the negative aspects of youth:   

- effacing signs of wisdom, living, experience

- marginalizing memory and experience

- holding hostage our attention with nostalgia, however inaccurate it may be

- wasting our resources and energy on how many wrinkles we have (or could have one day) rather than living and thriving

- rigidifying ourselves to better resemble a 2-dimensional, taxidermic, still-life identity rather than embracing life as movement and evolution with ever more to discover

- giving into clannishness and identity appearance politics typical of adolescents who are copying instead of creating new paths thanks to the lives we have built… and the fruits of our experiences and travails

Instead, we should be trying to integrate the positive aspects of youth.  

After all, what actually constitutes “youthful” living?  Curiosity, liveliness, liberty, autonomy, eagerness, taking on new challenges, defying norms and trying out new playgrounds, being groundbreaking, audacity, excitement, innovativeness…  All characteristics that are potentially enhanced with age!

In reality, we need to age to be able to live young!  Instead of trying so desperately to reduce age to youth, we should be building youthfulness with age:

-     

- liberating our thoughts and wisdom, no longer beholden to adolescent conformity
- regenerating our brain acuity by continually learning new things, analyzed with due perspective
- confronting our ideas with others, including not like-minded people
- pursuing innovativeness which, as Regis Debray aptly put it, requires memory and experience
- being dynamic and constructive by activating our relativity & experience
- pioneering further as to how we want to live once our bodies are no longer as performing
- Expressing ourselves and living with passion now that we have shed the adolescent pitfalls of rejection, judgment, or alienation. “Living life out loud” as puts it Mike Robbins
- Revalue-ing as positive wisdom and experience, contemplation, analysis, etc. as a counterweight to today’s acceleration & superficiality

These shifts would enable us to move beyond performance society and embrace spherical rather than linear “then and than logic” so that we can actually build, at once, on our personal histories, desired future, current characteristics instead of trying desperately to efface them…  In short, we could actually benefit fully from “Being.”

In turn, this would enable us to actually welcome our human reality as growing beings who continually and renewably add and invest in their being through new experiences and perspectives… regardless of linearly quantitative “age”!

Let me know what you think, and stay tuned for another bite from the apple,

Eve